Meetings ▸ Minutes
Rules Special Committee — Minutes, May 6, 2024
City of Somerville, Massachusetts
City Council Rules Special Committee
Meeting Minutes
6:00 PM
Monday, May 6, 2024
This meeting was held via Zoom and was called to order by Chair Burnley at 6:01pm and adjourned at
6:22 pm with a roll call vote of 3 in favor (Councilor Ewen-Campen, Councilor Davis, and Chair
Burnley), none opposed, and none absent. Others present: Kimberley Wells – City Clerk; Natasha
Frazier – Assistant Clerk of Committees.
Roll Call
City Councilor At Large Willie Burnley Jr., Ward Six City
Councilor Lance L. Davis and Ward Three City Councilor
Ben Ewen-Campen
Present:
1.
Approval of the Rules Committee Minutes of September 12, 2022.
Committee
Minutes
(ID # 22-1622)
ACCEPTED
RESULT:
City Councilor At Large Burnley Jr., Ward Six City
Councilor Davis and Ward Three City Councilor
Ewen-Campen
AYE:
2.
City Clerk submitting an amendment to the Rules of the City Council to
accommodate remote participation and facilitate accessibility.
Officer's
Communication
(ID # 24-0415)
Clerk Wells stated that the proposed changes to the three separate rules have been
submitted to the City Council in order to align with the updates to the Open
Meeting Law. The proposed amendments account for remote participation in City
Council meetings, since remote participation is anticipated to be allowed.
Councilor Davis stated that he, Clerk Wells, and Legislative and Policy Analyst
Brendan Salisbury collaborated to develop language that acknowledges when City
Councilors vote remotely, it is preferable for them to appear on video. However, if
their video is not working, the language of these amendments allows for them to
vote by voice only. As stated throughout the meeting, the overall purpose of these
amendments is to enable the City Council to continue to do its business, for elected
officials to be able to vote, and to help ensure the vote is clear to members of the
public watching from home.
Councilor Davis moved to amend the language in Rules 5, 14, and 27 to add after
the phrase "visible on camera" as follows: , or, if video is not reasonably
practicable, able to be clearly and identifiably heard. Councilor Davis
stated that the purpose of amending the three rules with this language is to help
enable the City Council to continue to do its business and for elected officials to be
able to vote. Councilor Ewen-Campen expressed support for the amendments. The
motion was approved on a roll call vote of 3 in favor (Councilors Ewen-Campen,
Page 1 of 2
Rules Special Committee
Meeting Minutes
May 6, 2024
Davis, Burnley), none against, and none absent.
In subsequent discussion, Councilor Ewen-Campen asked if the language in Rule
14 regarding voicing one’s vote into the microphone applies to committee
meetings, or if the rule only applies to regular City Council meetings in the
chambers. He pointed out that are no microphones in the Committee Room. Clerk
Wells stated that her read of it is Rule 14 applies in the same situations in which it
previously applied, which is in the Council chambers around the horseshoe. She
stated that the part of the rule that was originally removed from the amended
version does state “physically situated within the City Council chambers.” Clerk
Wells also stated that her take on this is the rule will be fairly interpreted by the
presiding officer dependent on the meeting space that is available. Councilor
Ewen-Campen stated that he is supportive of the proposed amendments.
Councilor Ewen-Campen asked whether votes will be counted when councilors are
not in their seats during late-night budget meetings, for example. Clerk Wells
stated that this guidance exists for the presiding officer to preside over the meeting.
Clerk Wells stated that at the presiding officer’s discretion, if the vote is clear
enough, then that would likely satisfy the intent of the rule. If the vote was not
clear enough, the presiding officer could invoke the rule and tell everyone to sit in
their seats for their vote to be recorded. Clerk Wells stated that the goal is not rules
for the sake of rules. Rather, the end goal is to ensure members of the public who
are trying to engage with the proceedings are aware of what is happening, which
can be challenging if they cannot hear the votes that are cast. Councilor Davis
stated that Rule 14 is a rule that applies to the full Council, but that there is a
general interpretation of all rules. Additionally, Councilor Davis stated that he
reads the intent of the drafters as retaining discretion with the presiding officer. He
stated that the goal is to encourage people to speak clearly, and to be in the room,
so that the vote is clear to people watching at home.
Chair Burnley stated that these amendments are an effort to align with the Open
Meeting Law and increase the Council’s accessibility to people at home and in
person. He also noted that some people watching from home may not be able to
hike up the hill to City Hall. Chair Burnley stated that he does not think it is good
practice for councilors to stick their head into the City Council chambers to vote.
Chair Burnley stated that supports the amendments.
RECOMMENDED TO BE APPROVED AS
AMENDED
RESULT:
City Councilor At Large Burnley Jr., Ward Six City
Councilor Davis and Ward Three City Councilor
Ewen-Campen
AYE:
Referenced Documents:
•
Rules - 2024-05-06 Remote Rules Amended (with 24-0415)
Page 2 of 2