Matters ▸ Attachment
Translating SomerVision to Union Square (with 198429) — File 201515
42 |
Union Square Neighborhood Plan
Community Driven Planning
Translating SomerVision to Union Square
Union Square and Boynton Yard's Contribution to City-Wide Goals
SomerVision provides us with a policy framwork that
captures our thinking about diversity, community, economy,
accessibility, sustainability, and innovation to guide future
decisions made in neighborhood planning and capital
projects. During the development of SomerVision, a series of
public workshops helped the community articulate its shared
values (see page 34). All of these values are important, but
three are of particular value in planning the future of Union
Square and Boynton Yards.
The first is to foster the unique character of the
neighborhood to ensure that Union Square continues to be
itself as changes occur over time. This begins with placing
a high value on the people, history, culture, and way of life.
The second is to invest in and grow a resilient and diverse
economy that leverages all the benefits that new access
to transit will provide. To achieve fiscal self sufficiency
Somerville needs to attract and retain businesses that can
start here, grow here, and stay here while also investing in the
talents, skills, and education of residents to increase access to
employment opportunities. Third, is to fully embrace public
transportation so that the redesign of the public realm is safe
and inviting for all means of travel while at the same time
improving environmental quality and economic stability by
reducing dependance on automobiles.
To achieve all of these aspirations, SomerVision calls
for design-based neighborhood plans to guide future
development in a way that improves our quality of life.
Special priority is given to neighborhoods with existing or
future transit because they serve as important economic
engines for the city, focal points of community identity, and
areas that must adapt and change over time.
PLANNING FOR TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT
The daily commute is a fact of life for the majority of
Somerville residents. The city's vibrant squares capture most
trips necessary to meet daily and weekly needs, but with only
20,000 jobs and 45,000 workers, most people travel outside
of Somerville to go to work and many of those people drive.
For some, this work trip is short and the 'down time' can even
be rewarding, but for others the commute is long and causes
financial, emotional, and physical stress. Private automobile
ownership provides freedom and flexibility, but also
includes significant societal costs in terms of environmental
impact, infrastructure costs, accidents and injuries, and the
financial burden brought on by parking, gasoline, and annual
maintenance.
A number of SomerVision's top-level goals focus directly
on transit-oriented development (TOD). This term refers
to new development that uses specific planning and
design techniques to support investments made in public
transportation infrastructure and produce neighborhoods
that are compact, mixed-use, highly walkable, and
equitable for people of all ages and incomes. Although
every neighborhood should have these traits, TOD
planning leverages public transit as an asset for community
development.
Public transit and transit-oriented development will play a
defining role in achieving many of SomerVision's goals. It
reduces congestion by giving some people an alternative to
driving. It reduces the emission of pollutants and greenhouse
gases that would have otherwise been generated by transit
riders if they had driven cars instead. It decreases the amount
of money that riders must spend on gasoline and other costs
of operating private vehicles, and may even allow them to
reduce the number of vehicles they need to own. It frees up
time by allowing riders to work, read, sleep, or otherwise
relax on a train or bus instead of having to pay attention
to the road. It gives employers located near transit hubs
greater access to a more dispersed workforce. In general, it
creates efficiencies and reduces the per-capita impact of the
transportation system by allowing multiple travelers to share
the ride.
Extension of the Green Line to Union Square will facilitate
beneficial transit-oriented development in two different, but
related, ways. First, new transit service will provide existing
residents with a more direct link into the regional public
transportation system with less transfers while increasing
access to thousands of employment opportunities and
reducing costs associated with traveling to work. Secondly,
Somerville is well recognized as the densest municipality in
New England and Union Square's share of that population
along with its vibrant local culture, close proximity to
universities, and a number of ideal and available development
sites, positions the neighborhood to attract employers
looking to tap into the talent pool of existing residents.
Public transit and transit-
oriented development will play
a defining role in achieving
many of SomerVision's goals
| 43
Union Square Neighborhood Plan
Community Driven Planning
DEFINING WALKING DISTANCE
In neighborhoods with a well designed and walkable street
network, the proximity of origins and destinations to a
transit station has a direct association with transit ridership.
Studies from around the country routinely find that the
closer housing and jobs are to transit the higher probability
residents and employees will use the service. People are
generally willing to walk further to higher capacity, more
frequent service and will typically walk further to rail than
they will to the bus.
As a 'rule of thumb,' researchers study walking distances to
transit in intervals such as one-half mile, one-quarter mile,
or one-eighth mile. In a 2013 study of 1,450 transit stations
across the United States, researchers found that ¼ mile is the
distance people are willing to walk when traveling to or from
work and ½ mile is the distance people are willing to walk
when traveling to or from home. In fact, transit use drops
significantly for households located beyond a half mile from
the nearest transit stop. Climate and topography are typically
thought to influence walking in general, but multiple studies
have found that local topography has little to no effect on
walking to transit. Only the chance of rain influences the
choice to walk or not to public transportation.
The Last Quarter Mile
The use of public transportation when commuting
to work is critically dependent on a riders’ ability to
reach their final destination once they arrive and find
themselves on foot. Locating destinations close to
transit is even more essential than locating points of
origin near transit. Although it is well established that
households located within walking distance to a transit
station are five to six times more likely to commute by
transit than those living elsewhere, studies have shown
commuters are willing to walk further distances to
their homes than they are to their place of employment.
This is why locating commercial uses within a quarter
mile of a transit station is so important - so that
commuters can easily walk that last short distance on
foot. Trips to work represent a large share of the total
travel during the Monday-Friday work week, and the
decision employees make about how to commute to
work will have a significant impact on the livability and
sustainability of Union Square. Locating jobs close to
transit will encourage employees to leave their cars at
home, reducing traffic and improving air quality where
the new jobs are created.
N
WALKING DISTANCE
5 Minute Walk
10 Minute Walk
Somerville Ave.
Washington St.
Webster Ave.
Prospect St.
44 |
Union Square Neighborhood Plan
Community Driven Planning
DECREASING HOW MUCH WE DRIVE
Living or working within a close walking distance to transit
has been found to corollate with substantially higher rates
of transit use. However, it is necessary to promote the
physical conditions and supporting policies that will to
discourage residents and employees from driving. Increased
development intensity in close proximity to transit stations
can unlock immense benefits (see page 42). However, when
development is simply transit adjacent, with significant
parking, or built without supporting policies that induce
transit-oriented behavior, it can also invite automobile traffic
and congestion. This will undo all of the benefit transit can
provide – especially at the local level.
In 2006, a study by Dr. Robert Cervero of UC Berkeley found
that office workers are most likely to use transit if frequent
feeder bus or shuttle service is available at one or both ends
of the trip, if employers help cover the cost of taking transit,
and if parking supply at the workplace is restricted. Providing
all three of these requires coordination between off-street
parking requirements in zoning, workplace transportation
demand management programs, and complimentary private
shuttle services.
More recently, two studies out of New York City and
northern New Jersey, some of the most transit-oriented
urban areas in the United States, uncovered a stunning
relationship between automobile ownership and use and
the availability of off-street parking. In a 2012 study of
neighborhoods in the Bronx, Queens, and Brooklyn boroughs
of New York City, Dr. Rachel Weinberger, a Principal
& Director of Research and Policy at Nelson\Nygaard
Consulting Associates, found a clear relationship between
the availability of parking at home and higher rates of driving
to jobs in the core of Manhattan, even when both the home
and workplace were well served by transit. When off-street
parking is relatively scarce, competition for on-street parking
increases the frustration of finding a parking spot and the
effort needed to walk from the parking spot to home or other
destinations. When a guaranteed, off-street parking space is
available, the ownership and use of an automobile becomes
a much more attractive option - regardless of the availability
of transit, highway access, or demographics. Therefore,
providing more parking induces more driving trips and more
local congestion.
In a 2013 study of households living within two miles of New
Jersey transit stations, Dr. Daniel Chatman of UC-Berkeley
confirmed the results from New York in another location
when he found that availability of off-street parking was
actually the single most important variable in determining
automobile ownership and commuting to work, regardless
of accessibility to a rail transit station. When looking only
at households within walking distance to a transit station,
households with both low on and off-street parking commute
by automobile 60% less than households with easy access
to parking. These results confirm other studies that warn
minimum parking requirements likely induce driving by
oversupplying parking at home. Chatman suggests allowing
developers to provide less off-street parking, while also
pricing, managing, and permitting on-street parking in order
to mitigate spillover effects.
DIFFERENT STATIONS, DIFFERENT FUNCTIONS
The Center for Transit-Oriented Development (CTOD),
a non-profit funded by the U.S. Government to promote
best practices in transit-oriented development, identifies
at least seven types of transit-oriented station areas. These
TOD place types were created to help simplify the complex
decisions that surround planning for TOD projects and
station areas at different scales and in different places. The
system provides a common language to compare station
areas and helps governments establish development targets
to ensure that investments made in transit are as efficient as
possible by focusing growth around transit nodes.
Not all TOD is necessarily equal. Some transit station areas
may be well suited to a particular type of development but
not as well suited to others. For instance, some station areas
URBAN CENTER
LOCAL CENTER
N
| 45
Union Square Neighborhood Plan
Community Driven Planning
might lend themselves to hosting large concentrations of
employment; others may be more appropriate for primarily
a mix of high-density housing and retail; still others may sit
at strategic locations on the highway network and thus be
well-positioned to intercept car commuters by functioning
as park-&-ride stations. Because of this, promoting TOD
is not necessarily a one-size fits-all approach; the unique
characteristics of each individual station area inform
decisions about the type of appropriate development.
Within the scope of COTD's station area types, the Union
Square plan area today can be classified as what CTOD calls
a local Transit Town Center. This station area type functions
as a local serving center of economic and community activity.
Like other locally serving centers, Union Square's existing
transit service is primarily made up of bus lines that feed
riders into the regional rail system at Sullivan Station,
Lechmere Station, and Kendall Square or, to a lesser degree,
high-frequency regional bus and limited stop bus rapid
transit (BRT) that cross through Brookline and Boston on
their way to Dudley and Ruggles Stations. Also like other
local centers, Union Square has an existing mix of both multi-
unit and single-unit housing, as well as retail, smaller to
medium-scale employment, and civic uses.
With the arrival of the Green Line and both public and
private investments in redevelopment, the eastern portions
of Union Square and Boynton Yards could evolve into an
Urban Center focused primarily on employment. CTOD
defines Urban Centers as a station area with a dense mix
of employment, residential, retail, and entertainment uses
and destinations that attract residents from surrounding
neighborhoods. Once Union Square station is built and
light rail service begins, Union Square and Boynton Yards
will include a full suite of transit options, like other Urban
Centers around the country, and be positioned to attract
employers seeking to benefit from locating their business
within this type of station area.
PLANNING AN URBAN EMPLOYMENT CENTER
Union Square and Boynton Yards have an opportunity to
develop into a employment focused urban center with a mix
of diverse and high-quality jobs. Union Square and Boynton
Yards, along with Assembly Square, are well positioned
to serve as the primary economic engines of Somerville.
Together, they can help provide the commercial tax base
that will reduce Somerville's dependence on state aid and
residential taxes and fees.
Somerville's financial self-determination is perhaps the
most difficult of the SomerVision goals to nail down as a
quantitative goal because property valuations are dynamic -
changing every year. However, we are already beginning to
see the benefits that new businesses can bring to rebalancing
the City's finances. Commercial development at Assembly
Row has already started to reduce residential tax increases,
although commercial development across the city os not
yet creating tax decreases (see Reducing the Residential Tax
Burden on page 46).
CTOD recommends using the following development criteria
when planning for an employment focused urban center
station area. Following these guidelines will help to ensure
that Union Square and Boynton Yards evolve according to
expectations.
Urban Employment Center Station Area
Total Square Footage
7 to 10 million sf
Station Area Total Employment
15,000 to 30,000
Station Area Total Housing
5,000 to 10,000
Use Mix Ratio (Com/Res)
60%/40%
Commercial Floor Area Ratio (min)
2.0
Jobs to Housing Ratio (min)
6 to 1
Residential Density (max)
50 DU/Ac
•
Total Square Footage is a range of built square footage
that helps to determine the ultimate scale and intensity
of development in the station area.
•
Station Area Total Employment is a range of
employment that identifies an appropriately scaled
concentration of jobs in the station area and can inform
the balance between various uses of floor space.
•
Station Area Total Housing is a range of dwelling units
that identifies the appropriate amount of housing in
the station area and can inform the mix and variety of
housing types permitted for new development.
•
Use Mix Ratio identifies an appropriate proportion of
commercial and residential floor space in the station
area and can inform various policy tools to achieve the
desired mix.
•
Commercial Floor Area Ratio identifies a baseline
amount of commercial floor space is produced for
office, lab, retail, hotel and creative enterprises to make
an urban employment center possible. However, not
every site in the urban center will be appropriate for
commercial buildings.
•
Jobs to Housing Ratio maintains a proper balance
Commercial development at
Assembly Row has already
started to reduce residential
tax increases.
112 |
Union Square Neighborhood Plan
A Vision for the Future
A Vision for Mobility
Embracing a Future with Transit
This section explores a vision for mobility (how
we get around) and how the transportation
network in the Union Square plan area should
function. First, we review SomerVision's various
objectives for transportation improvements along
with its guidance on how people should travel.
Next we cover recommendations to embrace
advanced mobility planning, a plan for returning
Union Square's main streets to two-way traffic,
completing the streets for all travel modes, street-
calming, connecting Union Square to new places,
improving public transportation, and managing
parking.
SomerVision's Mobility Targets
SomerVision includes a set of aspirational
targets for economic development, housing
construction, and open space improvement,
along with guidance on how people should travel
and where development should occur within
the city. The primary mobility objective is for at
least 50% of all new trips to made be by public
transportation, walking, or bicycling. SomerVision
also seeks to improve our shared environmental
quality, reduce pollution, and decrease traffic
& congestion through the use of transportation
modes other than the private automobile. These
include expanding walking and bicycling; building
complete streets that are balanced for all modes
of travel; promoting Mobility Management
best practices; managing the supply of parking,
supporting car sharing and bike sharing services;
reducing parking requirements for transit oriented
development, seniors, and residents in affordable
housing; and permitting shared parking.
Complete the Streets for All Users
The Somerville Complete Streets Ordinance, the
first of its kind in Massachusetts, states: "Complete
Streets are designed and implemented to assure
safety and accessibility for all the users of our
streets, paths and transit systems, including
pedestrians, bicyclists, transit riders, motorists,
commercial vehicles, emergency vehicles and
for people of all ages and of all abilities". By
adopting this ordinance, the City is committed
to incorporating Complete Streets planning and
design "into public transportation projects in
order to provide appropriate accommodation for
bicyclists, pedestrians, transit users and persons of
all abilities, while promoting safe operation for all
users, in comprehensive and connected networks,
in a manner consistent with, and supportive of, the
surrounding community."
ESTABLISH MODE PRIORITIES
To implement the City's Complete Streets
policy, the City is advancing a pedestrian-first
modal hierarchy. All transportation projects and
programs, from scoping to maintenance, will favor
pedestrians first, then transit riders, cyclists, and
motor vehicles. This implementation approach
will rebalance Somerville's streets to make
them more 'complete,' reversing generations of
automobile-focused planning and design at the
expense of all other transportation modes. This
pedestrian-first modal hierarchy resets the default
premise for transportation projects in Somerville
by acknowledging that every trip begins and ends
as a pedestrian.
Recommendations
•
Prioritize pedestrians first modal hierarchy
for all transportation projects and programs,
from scoping to maintenance.
A GREEN LIGHT FOR 2-WAY STREETS
Streets are an existing, flexible framework that
serve as the foundation for building a strong
community. When the ‘traffic’ function of our
streets is prioritized over of the ‘civic’ function, it
limits the ability of our streets to support the local
economy and community to their fullest.
During the Union Square neighborhood planning
process, community members voiced their strong
desire for the City to finally fix the traffic and
congestion problems in Union Square. At the same
time, they wanted more than just an engineering
based solution for moving traffic through. From
complete streets advocates to everyday residents,
the public desires to rethink the role streets play in
the culture of the neighborhood.
Providing for vehicular travel is just one the many
roles that streets play in community development.
They can also contribute to a sense of place and
support economic development efforts when they
SOMERVISION
X.X.X.
The City should .........
......................................
......................................
X.X.X
The City should .........
......................................
......................................
| 113
Union Square Neighborhood Plan
A Vision for the Future
are easy to navigate and more connected whether
you are walking, biking, taking transit, or driving.
Placemaking efforts that go hand in hand with
redevelopment typically focus on the redesign of
streets because the planning and design of streets
over recent decades has been automobile-focused
at the expense of all other transportation modes.
We can't expect new investment along streets
that simply don't work properly - for vehicles or
people.
Today, Union Square's street network is designed
as a multi-lane one-way 'bow tie' at the core of the
neighborhood. Somerville Avenue, Washington
Street, Webster Avenue, and Prospect Street all
restrict travel in a single direction. One-way streets
are thought to provide higher vehicular capacity
by increasing the number of lanes in a single
direction. They also make it easier to coordinate
a series of traffic lights into what is known as a
'green wave,' which allows a continuous traffic
flow over several intersections. Green waves
are not harmful in and of themselves (they can
reduce emissions and fuel consumption), but
when combined with one-way streets the result
prioritizes vehicles driving through the square
to get to other places rather than supporting the
vibrancy of the square itself.
The design of Union Square's one-way street
network is based on the idea that they move
traffic better than two-way streets. However, the
negatives of the system outweigh the positives.
One way streets frequently increase vehicular
speeds, and there is some evidence that drivers are
less attentive because there are no cars heading in
the other direction to watch out for. Vehicles stop
less often on one-way streets, which makes things
harder for cyclists trying to turn and pedestrians
trying to cross the street. Taking public transit
becomes more difficult on one-way streets because
bus stops are not located on the opposite side of
the street from one another. A trip in the other
direction requires you to find a stop on an entirely
different street. Furthermore, one-way streets
have an impact on the local economy because they
reduce visibility of retail and restaurants because
they route trips to and from work onto different
streets.
Dr. Vikash Gayah, a Civil Engineering Professor
from Penn State University, questioned the
conventional wisdom of one-way streets in a study
from 2012. Vehicular traffic is normally measured
as the number of cars flowing past a specific spot.
The more cars, the better the traffic flow. But
measuring efficiency this way doesn't account
for the fact that driving on a one-way street
system frequently means traveling in a circular
route to your destination, which adds distance
to every trip. By considering both the flow and
the extra travel distance created by a one-way
street network, the true 'trip-serving capacity' of
a street can be measured. When put to the test,
Dr. Gayah found that two-ways streets perform
about the same or even better than one-way
streets, especially if they control left turns in an
economical way.
In 2016, the City will return Prospect Street
and Webster Street, from Somerville Avenue to
their crossing, to two-way traffic for the first
time in decades. By re-striping the streets and
installing new traffic signals on an interim basis,
the City will test the removal of unnecessary
traffic movements to inform a more formal and
permanent design to alleviate congestion and
improve traffic flow in the future. Somerville
Avenue should be next.
Recommendations
•
Convert Somerville Avenue, Prospect Street,
and Webster Street to two-way traffic flow.
EMBRACE PROTECTED BIKEWAYS
In 2005, the Transportation Department for
the City of Portland, OR was the first to classify
the different types of cyclists that exist within
a population: the Strong and Fearless (<1%),
Enthused and Confident (7%), Interested but
Concerned (60%), and No Way, No How (33%).
No matter the category, surveys have found
that the number one reason that many people
do not consider bicycling as a valid means of
transportation is because they are afraid to be
on the same roadway as automobiles. Achieving
SomerVision's goal for 50% of trips to be via
transit, cycling, or walking will require making
our streets, wherever we can, as safe and
comfortable for the Interested but Concerned
SOMERVISION
X.X.X.
The City should .........
......................................
......................................
X.X.X
The City should .........
......................................
......................................
114 |
Union Square Neighborhood Plan
A Vision for the Future
group of the population. To tap into this largest
group of potential cyclists, Somerville will
need to make transformative investments in
bicycle infrastructure and on creating a fully
connected grid of protected bikeways on busy
streets and bicycle boulevards through quiet
neighborhoods. This policy could be further
enhanced by empowering the community to create
Neighborways, Playborhoods, or PlayStreets on
our neighborhood streets.
Protected bikeways are a category of bicycle
facility that separates bicyclists from motorists.
They can be at road or sidewalk level and
separation can be created in a variety of ways
including parked cars, plastic posts, raised curbs,
or even planters. The means separation can even
change along a route depending on the width
available and the design of intersections.
Research has found that protected bikeways
reduce the risk of injury by up to 90% when
compared to standard, unprotected bike lanes. By
removing or reducing the sense of fear involved
with sharing a travel lane with an automobile,
research shows that within the first year after
installation, a protected bikeway facility increases
bicycle ridership by 75% on average.
Not every street in Somerville is wide enough for
a protected bikeway, but sharrows and even bike
lanes will not encourage riders afraid of riding
alongside automobiles to change their travel
behavior.
Recommendations
•
Prioritize the construction of protected
bikeways on major streets when feasible
within the right-of-way.
•
Implement Bicycle Boulevards in
neighborhoods where appropriate.
•
Establish a formal process for residents to
establish a Neighborway, Playborhood, or
PlayStreet.
Calming the Streets
During the Union Square Neighborhood planning
process the following streets were all identified by
community members as having issues with either
cut through traffic or fast moving vehicles: Vinal
Ave, Perry St , Concord Ave, Dane Ave, Properzi
Way, Calvin St, Boston St, Summit Ave, and Walnut
Street. Each of these streets deserves to be closely
looked at to determine what happening and
measures that can be take to ensure safety for all
users.
SOMERVISION
X.X.X.
The City should .........
......................................
......................................
X.X.X
The City should .........
......................................
......................................
The Human Eye and Street Design
The physiology of the human eye has many implications
for urban design. The retina of our eye functions similar
to film in a camera, interpreting what we are looking at,
and plays an important role in how we perceive the world
around us.
The central part of our retina is called the fovea. This area
is densely packed with over 25,000 cells that detect light
and color. Each cell is individually connected to a nerve
fiber. These cells provide us with very high resolution
vision for tasks such as threading a needle.
Surrounding the fovea is another area of color detecting
cells called the macula. Macular vision is very clear, but
not as sharp as with the fovea because the cells are further
apart from one another. As you move away from the
center of the retina the nature of our vision fundamentally
changes. Cells that detect color become scattered and cells
designed for seeing at night become more prominent.
Outside of the macula is the peripheral retina, with cells
designed more for night vision and where up to 200 or
more cells are connected to a single nerve fiber. When
more than one cell is connected to a nerve fiber, resolution
decreases and the perception of motion is increased. This
is why moving objects are easily caught ‘out of the corner’
of our eye, but everything is out of focus.
When we ourselves are moving, objects seen in our
peripheral vision exaggerate the speed our brain thinks
we are traveling. This means that streets lined with on-
street parking and street trees provide a natural ‘visual
friction’ that slows down drivers because they think they
are moving faster than they actually are. As a result, streets
with on-street parking and street trees are naturally safer
streets for pedestrians than streets without.
| 115
Union Square Neighborhood Plan
A Vision for the Future
INTRODUCE VISUAL FRICTION
The most effective way to slow vehicular traffic
on urban streets is to create ‘visual friction’ that
impacts a driver’s perception of safety. When
travel lanes have appropriate widths, streets with
two-way traffic flows are generally observed to
have slower speeds than one-way streets because
drivers are careful not to sideswipe each other.
Vehicular speed decreases even further when
features like on-street parking and street trees are
provided on both sides of the street (causing more
‘visual friction’). This happens because objects
seen out of our peripheral vision make drivers
feel like they are moving faster than they really
are, due to the way our eyes see and interpret our
surroundings.
The safest type of neighborhood street for
pedestrians is one featuring a shared travel lane
14-16 feet wide with no center stripe and parking
lanes on both sides. This type of street is called
a “yield street” because cars passing each other
are forced to slow down and in many cases one
car is even required to pull over slightly to make
enough room for the other to pass. Yield streets
significantly reduce travel speeds and promote
safety for all modes because of the ‘visual friction’
they provide.
Recommendations
•
Install, monitor, and evaluate the effectiveness
of interim traffic calming techniques on
problematic neighborhood streets in the
Union Square plan area.
•
Conduct a physical survey of problematic
neighborhood streets in the Union Square
plan area to accurately map curb cuts, existing
street trees, and existing on street parking.
•
Opportunistically convert problematic
neighborhood streets in the Union Square
plan area into 'yield streets' when possible.
PRIORITIZE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
In 1969, about half of all U.S. children walked
or biked to school, with approximately 87% of
children who lived within one mile of school
walking or bicycling. Today, less than 15% of
children walk or bike to school. As a result, kids
today are less active, less independent, and less
healthy. Safe Routes to School (SRTS) programs
are designed to reverse this trend by getting more
children walking and bicycling to schools on a
daily basis.
In July 2005, Congress passed federal legislation
that established a National Safe Routes to
School program to improve safety on walking
and bicycling routes to school and to encourage
children and families to travel between home and
school using these modes.
Currently, the Argenziano School maintains a
safe routes to school map that identifies ideal
routes for children to walk or bike to the school.
The City's safe routes to school are included
as priority repairs, as the Neighborhood Street
Reconstruction Program continues to improve
existing sidewalks and curb ramps so that they
more accessible to all users, regardless of ability.
At the same time, special attention should be paid
to safe route streets in the Union Square plan area
so that additional improvements can be made to
promote walking and cycling for children.
Recommendations
•
Prioritize streetscape and street design
improvements for safe routes to school in the
Union Square plan area.
ADOPT A 20 IS PLENTY CAMPAIGN
Neighborhood Slow Zones are a program to
reduce traffic speed from the standard unposted
speed on neighborhood streets from 30 mph to
20 mph. This reduction in speeds by 10 MPH
represents the critical difference between life
and death, with a demonstrated 42% reduction
in pedestrian casualties. The establishment of
Slow Zones should be investigated throughout the
Union Square plan area, with gateway signage and
markings put in place to indicate to drivers that
they are using neighborhood streets within a slow
zone.
Recommendations
•
Petition the legislature to allow a reduction of
the speed limit to 20 miles per hour.
SOMERVISION
X.X.X.
The City should .........
......................................
......................................
X.X.X
The City should .........
......................................
......................................
116 |
Union Square Neighborhood Plan
A Vision for the Future
Embrace Transit-Orientation
Public transit and Transit-Oriented Development
will play a defining role in achieving many of
SomerVision's goals (see page 34). Transit use
reduces congestion by giving people an alternative
to driving. It reduces the emission of pollutants
and greenhouse gases that would have otherwise
been generated by transit riders if they had driven
cars instead. It decreases the amount of money
that riders must spend on gasoline and other costs
of operating private vehicles, and may even allow
them to reduce the number of vehicles they need
to own. It frees up time by allowing riders to work,
read, sleep, or otherwise relax on a train or bus
instead of having to pay attention to the road. It
gives employers located near transit hubs greater
access to a more dispersed workforce.
In addition to these broad benefits, extension
of the Green Line to Union Square will provide
existing residents with a more direct link into the
regional public transportation system, increasing
their access to thousands of employment
opportunities and reducing costs associated
with traveling to work. Additionally, it attracts
employers to the neighborhood that are looking to
tap into the talent pool of the densest municipality
in New England.
Living or working within a close walking distance
to transit has been found to corollate with
substantially higher rates of transit use. However,
it is necessary to promote the physical conditions
and supporting policies that will discourage
residents and employees from driving. Increased
development intensity in close proximity to transit
stations can unlock immense benefits (see page
42). However, when development is simply transit
adjacent, with significant parking, or built without
supporting policies that induce transit-oriented
behavior, it can also invite automobile traffic and
congestion. This will undo all of the benefit transit
can provide – especially at the local level.
IMPLEMENT MOBILITY MANAGEMENT
SomerVision includes 12 goals, policies, or actions
related to Mobility Management. Sometimes
called the more tedious 'transportation demand
management' (TDM), mobility management is a
program of services, information, and incentives
to help people know about and use all of the
transportation services that are available. It is
specifically designed to counter balance many of
the existing incentives that encourage people to
drive, such as free parking. Mobility management
promotes the efficient use of our transportation
system as a cost effective alternative to increasing
parking supply or roadway capacity while also
improving overall accessibility and sustainability.
In 2015, the Mayor's Office of Strategic Planning
and Community Development proposed mobility
management standards for the Somerville
Zoning Ordinance overhaul that would require
new commercial and multi-tenant residential
development of a certain size to implement
mobility management practices. Measures that
support mobility management cover a broad range
of low cost programs, policies, and services. These
frequently include providing information about
transit services in the neighborhood, unbundling
the price of parking from the cost to rent a
dwelling unit or commercial space, participating
in the State's guaranteed ride home program,
providing preferential parking for car-poolers,
flexible work schedules to reduce peak time travel,
allowing employees to use pre-tax dollars to
purchase transit passes, and even subsidizing the
cost of transit, car-share, or bike-share passes for
employees.
Recommendations
•
Establish requirements for new commercial
and multi-tenant residential development to
implement Mobility Management policies and
programs in the Somerville Zoning Ordinance.
•
Create a Transportation Management
Association for Union Square and Boynton
Yards to efficiently manage and market
mobility programs and services for members.
Adopt Smart Parking Policy
The most valuable use of above ground floor
space for new development in Union Square and
Boynton Yards is as commercial or residential
uses, not parked cars. Parking is a commodity, and
as such, should be dictated by market demand and
not by parking standards that are unresponsive to
changes in cultural attitudes about how we travel
SOMERVISION
X.X.X.
The City should .........
......................................
......................................
X.X.X
The City should .........
......................................
......................................
| 117
Union Square Neighborhood Plan
A Vision for the Future
and routinely overestimate actual need.
Parking should be regulated in an entirely
different way in transit-accessible neighborhoods
than it is for areas of the city outside of walking
distance to a transit station. Studies have found
a clear relationship between the availability of
parking at home and higher rates of driving to
work, even when both the home and workplace
were well served by transit. When looking only
at households within walking distance to a
transit station, households with both low on-
and off-street parking commute by automobile
60% less than households with easy access to
parking. Locating jobs close to transit encourages
employees to leave their cars at home, reducing
traffic and improving air quality. However, when
a guaranteed, off-street parking space is available,
the ownership and use of an automobile becomes
a much more attractive option. Together this
research highlights that providing parking in and
of itself likely induces more driving trips and leads
to more local congestion.
ADOPT TRANSIT ORIENTED PARKING
STANDARDS
There are four different approaches to setting
parking standards for new development. They
range from conventional minimum parking
requirements to policies that both levy parking
maximums, and some of them actually hinder
transit-oriented development.
One option is to custom tailor parking
requirements to reflect lower vehicle ownership
rates close to transit. Another option is to have no
parking requirement altogether and let developers
determine the most appropriate amount of
parking to provide based on the market. This
avoids oversupplying parking to the point where
many spaces sit empty. However, these first two
policies simply try to better match parking supply
to demand, instead of actively working to induce
transit ridership. A third option, involves limiting
the amount of parking that developers are allowed
to supply. The type of parking policy chosen for
new development will determine whether or not
it is transit-oriented, helping to achieve the goals
of SomerVision, or transit adjacent, with a lack of
policies that support transit use and parking that
encourages automobile traffic and congestion in
the very locations most served by transit.
New parking standards should be adopted in
zoning that fully support the transit-oriented
development that SomerVision calls for. This
likely means establishing parking maximums for
residential uses within 1/2 miles and commercial
uses within 1/4 mile of the new Union Square
station of the Green Line (see page 43 for more
information). This decision also has the ability to
SOMERVISION
X.X.X.
The City should .........
......................................
......................................
X.X.X
The City should .........
......................................
......................................
How Parking Standards Impact Other Goals
118 |
Union Square Neighborhood Plan
A Vision for the Future
be customized at different scales. For example,
when applied to individual development projects,
a maximum function is to limit the amount of
parking than can be built by each. Another more
flexible way to accomplish the same goal is to
apply a maximum at a district scale. This would
permit early phases of development to build
parking that counts against an upper cap of total
parking allowed. Once that threshold is achieved,
no more parking would be permitted to be built for
subsequent projects.
Recommendations
•
Adopt new parking standards in the
Somerville Zoning Ordinance for transit
oriented properties in the Union Square plan
area.
ENCOURAGE SHARED PARKING
Traditional parking requirements maintain
that individual land uses should have dedicated
parking supplies. However, walkable mixed-use
(and soon to be transit-oriented) neighborhoods
like Union Square can allow for parking to
be shared. Visitors can park once and walk to
multiple destinations; employees can park once
for the day and walk to run errands. Each land use
does not need its own dedicated supply of parking,
yet that is exactly what standard analysis and
zoning indicate is needed.
In reality, real parking demand is rarely constant;
it changes over time. For example, an office may
have a high demand until 5pm, and a restaurant
open for dinner may have a high demand only
after 5pm.
Shared parking encourages use of large centralized
parking facilities and discourages the development
of many small facilities. This results in more
efficient traffic flow because there are fewer
curb cuts, and turning opportunities on main
thoroughfares. This has the added benefit of
reducing accidents and reducing emissions from
idling vehicles stuck in traffic. Additionally, shared
SOMERVISION
X.X.X.
The City should .........
......................................
......................................
X.X.X
The City should .........
......................................
......................................
| 119
Union Square Neighborhood Plan
A Vision for the Future
parking can reduce the burden placed on adaptive
developments in historic buildings by allowing
a change of use without requiring incongruent
surface or structured shared parking on the site.
Municipalities may encourage shared parking in a
number of ways, including:
•
District Based Sharing: Different uses in a
defined district share parking (Montgomery
County, MD)
•
Free Range Sharing: Individuals create
parking partnerships, and shared parking is
allowed in zoning. (Long Beach, CA)
•
Land Use: Some specific shared parking
minimums exist for certain land use types.
(Waltham, MA)
•
Minimum Provision: A certain amount
of parking for each use must be shared
(Cambridge, MA)
An example of free range shared parking similar
to what could happen in Union Square is a
mixed-use building in South Boston called The
Residences at 50 Broadway (shown at left). This
building is one block from the Broadway Station
of the Red Line, but when it was constructed an
oversupply of parking was included. Today, new
infill buildings in the neighborhood are leasing
spaces from 50 Broadway because it has an excess
of parking beyond what the residents and ground
floor businesses actually need, primarily due to the
nearby transit service.
Recommendations
•
Permit shared parking between uses and
buildings in the Union Square plan area
Manage Parking as a Resource
Parking management includes a number of
strategies that encourage a more efficient use of
on- or off-street parking, improve the quality of
service provided to the users of parking facilities,
and improve the overall design of parking lots and
structures. Managing parking includes a broad
range of possible strategies including metering
parking for short term turn over, residential
parking permits, demand based pricing of on-
street parking, and parking management districts.
METERING PARKING FOR TURNOVER
Parking spillover by employees is not a concern
in most downtowns because curb parking is
typically metered for short term turnover rather
than all-day use. If employers provide employees
the option to cash out their use of an off-street
parking space as part of a mobility management
program, there need not be a fear that they will
take their cash and park on the street. This barrier
to spillover allows cities like Boston and new
districts like North Point to cap the total number
of parking spaces in new development without
worrying about spillover.
Recommendations
•
Consider limits on the length of stay for
metered parking spaces to induce short term
turnover.
•
Consider varying metered parking rates based
on the length of stay to induce short term
turnover (1st hour = $1, 2nd hour = $2, etc)
RESIDENTIAL PARKING PERMITS (RPP'S)
Somerville currently has more than 11,600
registered vehicles per square mile; roughly 7,600
more cars per square mile than Boston and almost
3,600 more than Cambridge. This means there
is one vehicle to every 1.6 Somerville residents.
In the Union Square plan area there are 5,202
registered vehicles and 5,175 off-street parking
permits issued to residents.
Somerville's Residential Parking Permit program
offers on-street parking passes to residents with
a personal vehicle registered with the city for
$40/year. This equates to about $0.62 per day.
The Resident Permit Parking program has largely
been successful in achieving its original purpose
to mitigating spillover impacts from residents of
other towns and cities parking on neighborhood
streets.
The City's Department of Traffic and Parking
does not currently cross reference the number
of permits issued per household with the actual
number of curb parking spaces available on
a block, street, or neighborhood. Somerville
residents with an on-street permit are also
permitted to park on any street across the city.
This is an advantage enjoyed by many residents,
SOMERVISION
X.X.X.
The City should .........
......................................
......................................
X.X.X
The City should .........
......................................
......................................
120 |
Union Square Neighborhood Plan
A Vision for the Future
but these two characteristics of the City's
residential parking program can lead to a situation
where on-street parking in residential areas
becomes seriously congested because the program
facilitates both intra-city commuting and over use
of the on-street parking capacity of neighborhood
streets.
Low cost access to on street parking for residents
of new transit-oriented development can undo
all of the benefit transit can provide. Traditional
regulatory and pricing tools work well in busy
mixed-use areas, but nearby residential areas are
often the sources of the greatest complaints from
residents concerned about the impact of new
development.
Recommendations
•
Consider restricting the availability of on-
street parking permits for residents of new
transit-oriented development.
•
Consider whether it is still appropriate for on-
street parking permits to be used city-wide.
DEMAND BASED PRICING
Demand based pricing of on street parking in
commercial areas uses smart meters, sensors, and
demand-responsive pricing to open up parking
spaces and reduce circling and double-parking.
Demand-responsive pricing adjusts parking rates
by the time of day, day of the week, and even block
within the city. The idea is to charge the lowest
possible hourly rate to achieve the right level of
parking availability. In areas and at times when
it is difficult to find a parking space, rates are
incrementally increased in an effort to ensure that
at least one space is always available per block. On
a block where parking spaces are plentiful, rates
are decreased to attract drivers to the available
spaces in the neighborhood. Meters typically
allow payment with coins, debit/credit cards, or
local parking cards and typically interact with a
smart phone app to alert drivers in real time about
parking availability.
Recommendations
•
Conduct a curbside parking management
study to determine the logictics and costs
necessary to implement demand based pricing
for on street parking in Union Square
PARKING MANAGEMENT DISTRICTS
Finally, a number of possibilities exist for a
parking management district in the Union Square
plan area. A parking management district can
be managed by the City, a parking management
authority, a business improvement district, or a
transportation management association. How each
parking management district functions is always
unique to each place, but in essence all of them
provide public parking at a price and reinvest
the revenue directly into improving parking and
transportation in the neighborhood.
Montgomery County, MD offers a compelling
example for Union Square. Montgomery County's
Parking Lot District (PLD) program is financed
though an enterprise fund. These funds generally
mandate that developers in a certain district
pay fees to a dedicated financing program in
lieu of fulfilling minimum requirements for
municipal parking. Through the enterprise
fund, Montgomery County builds and operates
government-owned parking structures. Enterprise
funds are typically supported by a combination
of ad valorem taxes, parking services fees, and
SOMERVISION
X.X.X.
The City should .........
......................................
......................................
X.X.X
The City should .........
......................................
......................................
| 121
Union Square Neighborhood Plan
A Vision for the Future
The Future of Technology & Mobility
In 2015, the National League of Cities published a report
called City of the Future that explores existing trends and
potential future developments in mobility technology
with the specific purpose to help cities in mobility
planning. “Creating a transportation network – a platform
for commerce and human interaction – is one of the
oldest and most important functions of government.”
Government must adapt to quickly changing preferences
and technologies. Take a moment from reading this and
think of something transportation related that is now
obsolete because of advancement in technology (printing
directions from MapQuest!).
There are four contributing factors to changing mobility:
demographic and workforce trends, infrastructure finance,
the growth of public and private mobility systems, and
the availability of new modes of transportation. By 2020,
all of the baby boomers will have reached pre- and early-
retirement stages making millennials the largest segment
of the workforce. Millennials have already shown a
preference for non-automobile transportation. There
is also a larger shift in how workers occupy workspace.
Workbar has demonstrated success in Union Square
because of this shift in non-traditional work patterns.
The growth of public and private mobility systems focuses
on the increase in public transit options (rail and bus
lines), an adjustment to the efficiency of these systems
to reach the maximum amount of users, and an increase
in Transportation Network Companies (TNC). The most
popular TNC’s are Uber and Lyft (you know them, the cars
with pink mustaches). They, and possibly new players,
will continue in popularity and broaden their services into
related fields such as freight. Uber started with UberBlack
only 5 years ago and has expanded into UberTaxi, UberX,
and Uberpool.
New modes of transit are the most intriguing factor to
changing mobility. Drivers are most likely accustomed
to a Level 1 Autonomy rating: cruise control, automatic
braking, and lane keeping systems. A driver can take hands
or feet off of the wheel/pedals but never both at the same
time. Level 2 autonomy allows a driver to remove both
hands and feet at the same time, self-park technology is
an example. Level 4 is full self-driving automation where
the driver has no responsibility for safe operation of the
vehicle (are they still called a driver?). By 2020, Level 4
autonomy cars will be available for wealthy consumers
and industries seeing a return on investment of service
fleets. By 2025, these vehicles will be available for more
mainstream consumers. By 2030, commuters will likely
board driverless buses.
Due to the cost in changing our mobility infrastructure,
the physical form will mostly stay the same. However,
it will continue to be used in different ways by cyclists,
car sharing, public transit, and TNC’s. In the US, a
lack of safety is the largest barrier to cycling. A street,
redistributed to offer safe and dedicated space for cyclists,
will increase cycling rates. Electric assist technology on
bikes will decrease physical effort, another barrier to
cycling.
After 2030, the rollout of driverless technology in private
vehicle ownership, TNC’s, and trucking with the use of on-
demand technology will start having an impact on land use
decisions. On demand vehicles will reduce the need for
both on- and off-street parking. Today there are over 6,000
public and private (excluding driveways) parking spaces in
Union Square.
All the while, modes will begin to better coordinate into a
system of options in a more fluid manner than the current
system. Users have already changed to an “app-oriented
mindset” and expect information at the touch of a button.
Apps of the future will better coordinate information and
present/recommend options.
CITY OF THE
FUTURE
TECHNOLOGY & MOBILITY
122 |
Union Square Neighborhood Plan
A Vision for the Future
parking enforcement. Through this program,
Montgomery County operates more than half of
the public parking in three of its largest central
business districts — Bethesda, Silver Spring, and
Wheaton — as well as in the Montgomery Hills
community. Combined, these districts provide for
over 20,000 public parking spaces.
Recommendations
•
Investigate the creation of parking
management district and enterprise fund to
finance the construction and operation of
municipal parking structures in the Union
Square plan area.
•
Reinvest parking meter revenues for
transportation improvements in the parking
management district established for Union
Square.
Establish New Connections
Union Square is a crossroads. Look at Union
Square on a map and you'll see that the
neighborhood is hub of crossing routes that lead to
places like Harvard, MIT/Kendall, Porter Square,
Sullivan Square, and Central Square in just under
a mile. With some modes like cycling gaining
popularity and with the anticipation of the Green
Line Extension, investments in Union Square's
connectivity will balance transit options for the
plan area.
DELIVER THE GREEN LINE EXTENSION
In 2014 and 2015, the MBTA began bridge and
track work for the extension of the 'D' and 'E'
branches of the Green Line through Somerville. In
early 2015, the MBTA and the federal government
signed a full funding grant agreement to fund half,
almost $1 billion, of the GLX project with a match
from MassDOT. The project seemed well on its
way to becoming a reality after so many years of
advocacy and planning.
However, in the late summer of 2015, MassDOT
announced that the price estimates for the Union
Square spur and Washington Street stations
were $400 million over budget. If that cost
was extrapolated, that would make the entire
GLX almost a billion dollars over budget when
complete. Since that time, the City has been
working with MassDOT to address the cost
overrun and keep the Green Line Extension
moving forward. MassDOT and its Board of
Directors set a deadline of mid-May 2016 to reach
a decision on continuing the MBTA Green Line
Extension. A spring decision is needed to mitigate
the risk of excessive construction cost inflation
during delays. If the Commonwealth decides to
continue the project, major construction activities
would resume in 2017.
•
Continue to work collaboratively with
MassDOT and the MBTA to develop an
appropriate solution to the current cost
overruns.
INVEST IN BIKE SHARE
The denser the network of bike share stations will
help to enhance cycling as an option for both short
and medium length trips.
Recommendations
•
Require development projects to provide and
maintain service agreements for new Hubway
stations strategically located throughout the
Union Square plan area.
•
Locate a Hubway station at or across the street
from the Union Square station.
INVITE WORKER SHUTTLES
In 2006, a study by Dr. Robert Cervero of UC
Berkeley found that office workers are most likely
to use transit if frequent feeder bus or shuttle
service is available at one or both ends of the
trip, if employers help cover the cost of taking
transit, and if parking supply at the workplace is
restricted.
Employee shuttles can increase productivity and
general wellbeing by providing employees time
to prepare for the day ahead, whether that is a
chance to rest and relax, check email, or catch
up on the news. By linking to transit services,
employee shuttles help replace single-passenger
car trips and reduce vehicle miles traveled.
Additionally, employees routinely look at shuttles
as an added benefit because they save money on
gas and vehicle costs. This helps companies to
entice new hires and reducing turnover, but also
provides a less expensive alternative to expensing
SOMERVISION
X.X.X.
The City should .........
......................................
......................................
X.X.X
The City should .........
......................................
......................................
| 123
Union Square Neighborhood Plan
A Vision for the Future
mileage or building infrastructure like a parking
structure.
Recommendations
•
Encourage private services such as Bridj to
provide service to Union Square from other
locations in the region
•
Encourage employers to operate shuttle
services to employment locations outside of
1/4 mile from the future Union Square station
of the Green Line
ADVOCATE FOR THE "YELLOW LINE"
With the Green Line station in Union Square
moving toward reality, the community has
already begun to think about where other transit
opportunities exist. Inter-urban connections,
such as installing passenger rail on the existing
Grand Junction Line (or the “Yellow Line”) would
provide additional benefits for Union Square by
connecting the neighborhood directly to East
Cambridge, Kendall Square, MIT, Allston, Boston
University and, perhaps, even to North Station or
Everett. Extending the Green Line from Union
Square to Porter Square would further connect
the MBTA system and provide easier access to
points in Cambridge and communities along the
Fitchburg rail line. In both cases, rail right-of-
way already exists that is currently used for the
Commuter Rail or moving trains between North
and South Stations.
Somerville can take the lead in looking for
additional opportunities to expand rail and
enhance the economic opportunities in the
transformational districts by using new rail to link
future job centers to existing employment and
institutional hubs.
Recommendations
•
Collaborate with key stakeholders in the
Greater Boston area to conduct a feasibility
study for introducing passenger transit along
the existing Grand Junction rail line as well as
an off-street multi-modal path.
•
Engage a value capture study along the Grand
Junction line to determine the viability of
privately funding the creation of the stations,
passenger rolling stock, and ancillary facilities.
•
Review future transit projects with the
Department of Capital Projects to ensure
that any infrastructure investment does not
preclude transit expansion.
SOMERVISION
X.X.X.
The City should .........
......................................
......................................
X.X.X
The City should .........
......................................
......................................