Matters ▸ Attachment
water-sewer-rate-study-fy17-fy21 — File 202080
COMMITMENT & INTEGRITY DRIVE RESULTS
Water & Sewer
Rate Study
FY2017-FY2021
City of Somerville, MA
COMMITMENT & INTEGRITY DRIVE RESULTS
Rate Study Overview
Information Used in Evaluation
Approach and Evaluation Process
Findings of the Water & Sewer Rate
Study
Recommendations
Agenda
COMMITMENT & INTEGRITY DRIVE RESULTS
Rate Study Overview
Develop an accurate projection of the water and sewer
costs of service, including:
Operating Costs of running the utilities
Existing Debt Service obligations from past investments
Capital Costs of needed investments
Probable changes in MWRA Assessments
Recommend water and sewer rates sufficient to
ensure the utilities’ long term fiscal sustainability.
Understand practical impact for customers
COMMITMENT & INTEGRITY DRIVE RESULTS
Goals of a Rate Study
Revenue Stability
Revenue Sufficiency
Equitable Distribution of Costs to Users
Maintenance of Adequate Reserves
Easy to Understand and Administer
Affordability of Critical Public Services
COMMITMENT & INTEGRITY DRIVE RESULTS
Approach & Process
Review current and historical operating financials
Review historical and project future billed consumption
trends in Somerville
Evaluate Community specific business considerations
Develop defensible projection of future costs
Operational components
Capital components
Evaluate different rate structures
Project future performance of rate structures
COMMITMENT & INTEGRITY DRIVE RESULTS
Rate Setting Process
Intensive review of the water & sewer financial
records, billing records, and capital needs
Site Visits
Conversations and round table meetings with:
o
Acting Superintendent
o
Capital Projects Director
o
Finance Office
o
Auditors Office
o
City Treasurer
Understand the City’s desired rate structure
outcomes
COMMITMENT & INTEGRITY DRIVE RESULTS
Rate Setting Process
1.
Establishment of a realistic projection of the costs that
Somerville can expect over the coming five years:
o
Operational Costs & Existing Debt Service
o
Capital Program Costs
o
MWRA Costs
2.
Evaluation of historical billing records
o
Ability to project the amount of water and sewer service
which will be billed
o
Development of rates which yield durable revenue streams
3.
Iterative meetings with work group on preferred
combination of charges to fund the utilities.
COMMITMENT & INTEGRITY DRIVE RESULTS
Projected Operating Budgets
•
Based upon current budget escalated using industry norms
•
Water budgets are projected to increase from approximate $13M in
FY2017 to $16M in FY2021
•
Sewer budgets are projected to increase from approximately $20M in
FY2015 to $28M in FY2021
•
Modified funding/structuring of CIP can reduce the associated rate
impact
$0
$5,000,000
$10,000,000
$15,000,000
$20,000,000
FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 FY2021
Water Enterprise Fund - Revenue
Requirement
Operational Costs
MWRA Costs
Existing Debt Service
Capital Program Costs
$0
$5,000,000
$10,000,000
$15,000,000
$20,000,000
$25,000,000
$30,000,000
FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 FY2021
Sewer Enterprise Fund - Revenue
Requirement
Operational Costs
MWRA Costs
Existing Debt Service
Capital Program Costs
COMMITMENT & INTEGRITY DRIVE RESULTS
Capital Improvement Plans
Somerville is projected to have significant Capital
Investments over the next coming 5-years (FY2017
though FY2021)
Water System: ~$36M (unescalated cost estimate)
Sewer System: ~$65M (unescalated cost estimate)
Traditionally, many capital projects have been cash
financed on a year-by-year basis
Recommending a switch to debt financed capital
investment to minimize rate impacts of needed
investments.
COMMITMENT & INTEGRITY DRIVE RESULTS
Preliminary Findings
Three primary objectives for the rate study:
1.
Generate sufficient revenues to cover the full cost of service of
the utilities (including operating costs, existing debt service,
and the cost of the CIP)
2.
Build sufficient reserves to cover unanticipated costs and
prevent large year over year changes in rates
3.
Equitably generate needed revenue from the users receiving
the system benefits.
Preliminary Rate Recommendation
1.
Maintain existing three tier block rates
2.
Institute base charges rather than minimum charges
3.
Institute fire suppression charges
4.
Flat volumetric rates in water but annual adjustment to sewer
volumetric rates for next 5 years.
COMMITMENT & INTEGRITY DRIVE RESULTS
Recommended Rates - Water
1.
Recommend using current volumetric tiers sizes and relative tier
volumetric costs.
2.
Recommend institution of base monthly charges (level for 5
years).
3.
Recommend institution of fire suppression charges to better
recoup costs of investments from those customers receiving the
most tangible benefit from the investment.
4.
Recommended rates provide revenue streams adequate to fund
operations and needed capital investments.
COMMITMENT & INTEGRITY DRIVE RESULTS
Recommended Rates - Sewer
1.
Recommend using current volumetric tiers sizes and relative tier
volumetric costs.
2.
Recommend institution of base monthly charges (level for 5
years).
3.
Recommend annual 5% adjustment to volumetric rates through
2021.
4.
Recommended rates provide revenue streams adequate to fund
operations and needed capital investments.
COMMITMENT & INTEGRITY DRIVE RESULTS
Base monthly charges
Rationale behind use of base monthly charges
There are many costs to the utilities which have no correlation to metered
water and sewer usage.
Base charges are intended to partially cover these costs rather than spread
out these costs over the customer base on a volumetric basis
Water Costs unrelated to usage
1.
Purchase of meter
2.
Meter Reading/AMR
3.
Administration and Billing
4.
Distribution system tests
5.
Cost of UAW (~15% of MWRA
Water Assessment)
Sewer Costs unrelated to usage
1.
Purchase of meter
2.
Meter Reading/AMR
3.
Administration and Billing
4.
Cost of Population portion of
MWRA Assessment (~45% of
MWRA Sewer Assessment)
5.
Cost of stormwater related costs
of MWRA Sewer Assessment
COMMITMENT & INTEGRITY DRIVE RESULTS
THANK YOU!
QUESTIONS?
Toby Fedder
Vice President
[phone removed]
[email removed]