Matters ▸ Attachment
Committee Report - Leg Matters - 5-2-18 — File 205838
Legislative Matters Committee
Page 1 of 5
Printed 5/16/2018
May 2, 2018
REPORT OF THE LEGISLATIVE MATTERS COMMITTEE
Attendee Name
Title
Status
Arrived
Mark Niedergang
Chair
Present
Lance L. Davis
Vice Chair
Present
Mary Jo Rossetti
Alderman at Large
Present
Matthew McLaughlin
Ward One Alderman
Present
Katjana Ballantyne
Ward Seven Alderman
Present
Others present: David Shapiro - Law, Shannon Phillips - Law, Rich Raiche - Engineering, Annie
Connor - Legislative Liaison, Peter Forcellese - Legislative Clerk.
The meeting took place in the Committee Room and was called to order at 6:05 PM by Chairman
Niedergang and adjourned at 8:20 PM.
Alderman Ballantyne updated the committee on the Clarendon Hill project and said that a
request was made by both the developers and union representatives for the BOA to delay the
public meetings until Tuesday, May 8th. Therefore, the Finance Committee and Legislative
Matters Committee meetings scheduled for tomorrow, have been rescheduled to next Tuesday.
205043: Assistant City Solicitor responding to #204586 with a draft ordinance amending
the Ordinances at Chapter 11 Article VII re: stormwater management and infiltration and
inflow mitigation.
Mr. Shapiro reviewed the proposed ordinance and provided an answer to a previous inquiry
regarding backwater valves by saying that, pursuant to the state plumbing code, backwater
valves are required if the fixture “is subject to reverse flow or backpressure”. He also explained
that the charge paid by someone connecting to the system has to be a fee and not a tax and that the
fee must have a rational connection to the work and cost recovery. Alderman Davis suggested that
the language should reflect that an addition is being made to the inflow. Mr. Shapiro and Mr. Raiche
will discuss this concern and clarify the language. Mr. Raiche told the committee that the
Infiltration and Inflow (II) Mitigation ordinance, currently before the committee, is required by the
DEP and that it’s the city's first version and gives the city the tools to implement the II policy. Mr.
Shapiro defended the broad language of the II Mitigation section of the proposed ordinance by saying
that it is based on a Supreme Judicial Court case and on what has been done by other communities.
The committee discuss various aspects of the policy, including calculations based on bedroom
counts. Mr. Raiche estimated that a 3-bedroom building would generate 990 gal/day of discharge,
which translates to a fee of roughly $15,000. Mr. Raiche said that the trigger mechanism is through
Legislative Matters Committee
Page 2 of 5
Printed 5/16/2018
the building permit process when the envelope of the building changes. Alderman McLauglin had no
problem with someone paying more for additional water use but he is concerned about exemptions
given to big developers who choose to do major sewer work rather than pay to fulfill their obligations
and he would like language included requiring BOA approval for exemptions. Mr. Raiche explained
that the exemption is for interior renovations and that anyone doing a small project would most likely
pay the fee. On a larger project, a large developer could self-perform, thereby saving themselves
money. He suggested that perhaps there should be a fee for the engineer to review the developers'
plans and provide project oversight, since that is a requirement to qualify for self-performance. Mr.
Shapiro said he believes that this would be a service, therefore, a fee could be charged for the review
and oversight. Alderman Davis recommended adding language to that end in the ordinance.
Only a handful of other communities charge a similar fee, e.g., Cambridge, Waltham and Saugus,
mainly because most communities don't have combined sewer systems or are not under a DEP
Administrative Consent Order (ACO). The discussed revisions will be incorporated into the
proposed ordinance and sent to all members for review so that the item may be acted on at this
week’s BOA meeting on May 10th.
RESULT:
APPROVED AS AMENDED
198398: That this Board's Committee on Legislative Matters review the current pervious
surfaces ordinances for their effectiveness and sufficiency.
See discussion of #205701
RESULT:
KEPT IN COMMITTEE
205701: That the Administration share enforcement mechanisms for Ordinance 11-33,
Driveway Construction, as it relates to pervious surface area.
Chairman Niedergang stated that he wants to look at the ordinance and clarify how it's enforced.
Alderman Rossetti gave some background information on the issue. Mr. Raiche told the
members that, unlike drainlayers, the city does not have a list of approved driveway contractors
and he is unaware of what lists Inspectional Services (ISD) might have. He explained the
ordinance and permit procedure for installing a driveway, noting that the ordinance captures the
landscaping process and involves the DPW, ISD and the Engineering Department. He also
commented that the ordinance regarding driveways is zoning based and varies according to where the
driveway is, adding that the issuance of a permit cannot be denied unless a change is involved, e.g.,
removing a tree. Alderman Ballantyne stated that the city has an ordinance that allows a tree to be
cut down (see 204886 below) as long as it's replaced in proximity to the one removed. Chairman
Niedergang read from an ordinance, Section 11-33, c., Driveway construction: Paving contractor
registration. This section states that any construction on an inpervious driveway must be done by
someone who has registered with the City Engineer and execute a bond of no less than $2,500 with
the City. Chairman Niedergang stated that apparently nobody had informed Mr. Raiche that this is
one of the responsibilities of the Director of Engineering.
RESULT:
KEPT IN COMMITTEE
205421: Assistant City Solicitor submitting proposed amendments to Ordinances 11-31
and 11-40 re: household trash and rubbish collection and mandatory recycling.
Legislative Matters Committee
Page 3 of 5
Printed 5/16/2018
Ms. Phillips reviewed the minor edits that were requested at the committee’s April 5, 2018
meeting and Alderman Davis reported that his query regarding the contract termination was
satisfactorily answered. Alderman Rossetti introduced a data sheet estimating a cost savings to
the city of $4,872 from the textile recycling program.
RESULT:
APPROVED AS AMENDED
205487: That the Director of Sustainability and Environment update this Board on the
city’s textile recycling program in mid-September, 2018, identifying the concerns raised by
the Committee on Legislative Matters at its meeting on April, 5, 2018.
RESULT:
KEPT IN COMMITTEE
204364: That the City Solicitor and the Director of SPCD submit to this Board,
amendments to the Tree Preservation Ordinance with criteria for removal and notification
to add safeguards for street reconstruction projects.
Ms. Phillips reviewed the changes made to the ordinance in Sec. 12-106 d) and e). Ms. Connor
informed the members that Dr. Boukili suggested that the industry is moving to 3" diameter tree
and recommended that the city follow suit. Alderman Davis noted that the state statute is 1 ½”,
therefore, his motion to change “three inches” to “one and one-half inches” in the first paragraph
of Sec. 12-106 e) was unanimously approved.
Alderman Davis’ motion to include language in Sec. 12-106 e)(2)(a) stating that the public
hearings would include discussions of the cutting down or removal of trees was unanimously
approved.
Chairman Niedergang commented that the threshold for Capital Improvement Projects in Sec.
12-106 b) Definitions: should be more than $50,000. Ms. Connor explained that those projects
are exempted because they already have an exemption. Chairman Niedergang requested to see
the relevant language and Ms. Phillips stated that she has not seen any written policy on this.
Alderman Rossetti noted that there was a prior request to have the 48-hour notice printed on
colored paper. That change was omitted due to an oversight, therefore, Alderman Rossetti’s
motion to add the words “on brightly colored paper” to the 3rd paragraph of Sec. 12-106 d) was
unanimously approved.
Asked why the notification period for capital projects was longer than others, Ms. Connor
explained that the scheduling is different for capital projects. Written objections to cutting down
a tree may be submitted and after a public hearing and upon recommendation of the tree warden,
the mayor or the BOA may order that the tree be cut down, despite any written objections.
The committee was satisfied with the draft ordinance and completed its work on the matter. The
ordinance will be submitted to the BOA at its May 10, 2018 meeting for approval.
RESULT:
WORK COMPLETED
204782: Green and Open Somerville submitting comments re: #204364, proposed revisions
to the Tree Preservation ordinance.
Legislative Matters Committee
Page 4 of 5
Printed 5/16/2018
RESULT:
WORK COMPLETED
204886: That the City Solicitor and the City Arborist clarify the ordinance requiring tree
removal for a new driveway or other construction project.
Ms. Phillips discussed the ordinance and told the committee that Dr. Boukili thought it better that
person cutting down a tree pay into a tree replacement fund. Alderman Davis was concerned that
the ordinance doesn't address the location of the replacement tree and he’s hesitant to draw an
inference that it’s O.K. to cut down public shade trees. He questioned whether the interest of the
neighborhood is being addressed and suggested that perhaps if the tree can't be replaced near the
original location, then a request for a driveway should not be allowed. Ms. Phillips explained that's
why the payment should be made to the tree fund, in case the replacement tree can't go in a
proximate place.
RESULT:
KEPT IN COMMITTEE
204750: That the City Solicitor prepare a draft ordinance to address Airbnb rentals,
including owner occupied properties, as discussed at the November 29, 2017 meeting of the
Committee on Public Health and Public Safety.
Ms. Connor discussed the issue saying that a building of 3 or more units would have to be
reclassified from R3 to R1 for use as a hotel. The concern is that if a 3-unit facility does not
have a fire suppression sprinkler system, it would be rejected as an Airbnb. There is a possibility
of the building code being amended at the state board, however this needs to be resolved before
Airbnbs may be licensed. There is no sprinkler requirement for single or 2-family houses. The
Administration wants to hold 2 neighborhood meetings, one in the eastern and one in the western part
of the City, to communicate information to residents and to inform them that even if the building
code issue is resolved, there would still be other requirements that need to be met. Ms. Connor said
that there will be extensive discussion and public process around requirements for Airbnbs.
Alderman Ballantyne asked if there a distinction between a 3-family house with 3 units for rent vs. a
condo situated in a 3-family house. Alderman McLaughlin commented that the City of Cambridge
allows adjacent units to be rented out.
Ms. Connor told members that the Administration is considering imposing registration and licensing
fees to expand enforcement capabilities. Alderman McLaughlin suggested that perhaps fines, rather
than fees, might be assessed to crack down on the problem and pay for enforcement. He plans on
submitting a resolution at this week’s BOA meeting urging the state board to resolve the code issue.
Ms. Connor said that there is no timetable for the code issue to be resolved, so there is really no
formal action that the Administration wants to take until that’s addressed. Alderman Davis
recommended that the Administration keep moving the issue forward and Ms. Connor noted that the
Administration intends to do so while making it clear that legal registration for short-term rentals like
Airbnb will not be officially permitted until the state building code issue is resolved.
RESULT:
WORK COMPLETED
Handouts:
•
Backwater Valve Code (with 205043)
Legislative Matters Committee
Page 5 of 5
Printed 5/16/2018
•
Sewer, Drain, II Policy DRAFT 4-27-18 (with 205043)
•
Sewer, Drain, II Policy DRAFT 4-27-18 Red Lined (with 205043)
•
Sec 11-33 Driveway Construction (with 205701)
•
Sec 11-31 Household Trash (with 205421)
•
Solid Waste Costs (with 205487)
•
Sec 12-106 Trees on city property (with 204364)
•
Sec 12-103 Tree Replacement (with 204886)