Matters ▸ Attachment
Non-Union Classification and Compensation Study slide deck for FinCom 1.30.25 — File 25-0261
Non-Union
Compensation
Study
Presented to Finance Committee of the Whole
Thursday, January 30th, 2025
Agenda
1. Core Principles & Methodology
2. Proposed Classification Plan
3. Proposed Compensation Plan
4. Boards, Commissions & Elected Officials
5. Timeline & Rollout
6. Question & Answer
Within the City-Wide Classification &
Compensation Study…
9 bargaining units
575+ unique positions
SEIU School Custodians
Local 76 Fire Alarm
Local 888 e911
Local 76 Firefighters
SPEA Patrol Officers
SPSOA Police Superiors
SMEU (B unit)
SMEU (A & D units)
Non-Union
Boards, Commissions, & Elected Officials
Five contracts settled in the past year
Section 1: Core Principles &
Methodology
EQUITY
Comparable positions analyzed
across and within departments
6
CLARITY
Position grading is simpler and
easier for individuals and
managers to understand and
communicate
7
Consultant Review Process
Create pay
bands
Group
similar
positions &
compare
salaries
Score
positions on
13 grading
criteria
Collect
salary data
from
comparable
communities
Review Job
Descriptions
Full List
•
Arlington
•
Boston (Water & Sewer)
•
Brookline
•
Brockton (not pictured)
•
Cambridge
•
Framingham
•
Malden
•
Melrose
•
MWRA (not pictured)
•
Newton
•
Quincy
•
Waltham
•
Weymouth
•
Worcester (not pictured)
Map of comparable
communities
Classification
In compliance with the Massachusetts Pay Equity Law (M.G.L.
Chapter 149, Section 105A), a point factor evaluation system is
used to measure the “comparable value” of a position. Point
factor analysis (PFA) is a systemic approach used to objectively
evaluate in a consistent manner a position’s “comparable worth”
that requires substantially similar “skill, effort, and responsibility
performed under similar working conditions.”
13 Grading Criteria based on Job Duties
Skill
The knowledge, ability and skill
requirements of a job, rather than
an employee's personal skillset
• Education/Knowledge
• Experience
Effort
Job factors which cause mental
fatigue and stress, as well as those
which alleviate fatigue
Responsibility
The degree of discretion or
independence as well as
supervisory responsibility and the
degree to which the employee is
involved in decision-making
• Physical Demands
• Motor Skills
• Occupational Risk
• Work Environment
• Accountability
• Judgement
• Confidentiality
• Complexity
• Supervision Required
• Personal Contacts
• Supervisory
Responsibility
Section 2:
Proposed Classification Plan
Similar to Old Scale
• Established minimum and maximum salaries
• Starting step for new hires will increase over time
• Number of steps increased each FY subject to
economic conditions
• Standard set of metrics to grade and approve any
new positions
Classification Plan is easily
understandable for staff and managers
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
Executive Leadership
Major Dept Heads; City-wide accountability and authority
Independent judgment and discretion, work leader
Advanced knowledge required of a specific trade/field & may
supervise others
Reports into VI or to Executive; authority over Department
Under general direction of Dept Head, high level of
independence, judgment, supervisory
Department Leadership
Work Group Supervisor/Specialist
Manager
Under general supervision; duties governed by rules,
instructions or procedures
Individual Contributor II
Pay
Band
Non-Union Classification Plan
Individual Contributor I
New Structure - S Track
Positions requiring specific degrees or credentials,
or a combination of high scope, risk and
responsibility
Specific Degrees or Credentials
High Levels of Scope, Risk & Responsibility
•
Positions that require a specific degree as part of the Job
Description, such as a Masters in Library Science or degree in Data
Science
•
Positions that require as part of the Job Description professional
licensing specific to the field, usually in addition to specific degrees,
such as Certified Public Accountants (CPA) or Licensed Independent
Clinical Social Worker (LICSW)
Positions that take on some combination of:
•
Authority to oversee projects with substantial scope
•
High degree of financial and/or legal risk to the city
•
Organizational responsibilities that impact multi-departmental or citywide operations
and service provision
Addition of S Track recognizes roles
with additional requirements
I
II
S Track
III
S Track
IV
V
S Track
VI
Pay
Band
Non-Union Classification Plan
Individual Contributor I
Under general supervision; duties governed by rules, instructions or
procedures
Individual Contributor II
Independent judgment and discretion,
work leader
specific degree/credential or high
risk/scope/responsibility
Work Group Supervisor/Specialist
Manager
Under general direction of Dept Head, high level of independence, judgment,
supervisory
Advanced knowledge of a specific
trade/field & may supervise others
specific degree/credential or high
risk/scope/responsibility
Executive Leadership
Department Leadership
Reports into VI or to Executive;
authority over Department
specific degree/credential or high
risk/scope/responsibility
Major Dept Heads; City-wide accountability and authority
New Structure - M Track
Fields that qualify under S Track and that are not
necessarily in-house departments for a municipality,
but require expertise from credentialling such as a
Juris Doctorate degree or Professional Engineer
licensing, are classified as a 'market' track.
Comparable data from municipalities is minimal because this
work is typically outsourced to consultants & law firms
These additional pay bands are added for:
III M: Specialist
V M: Department Leadership
VI M: Executive Leadership
Proposed Non-Union Classification Grading
I
II
S Track
III
S Track
IV
V
S Track
VI
IIIM
VM
VIM
Pay
Band
Non-Union Classification Plan
Individual Contributor I
Under general supervision; duties governed by rules, instructions or
procedures
Individual Contributor II
Independent judgment and discretion,
work leader
specific degree/credential or high
risk/scope/responsibility
Work Group Supervisor/Specialist
Manager
Under general direction of Dept Head, high level of independence, judgment,
supervisory
Advanced knowledge of a specific
trade/field & may supervise others
specific degree/credential or high
risk/scope/responsibility
Executive Leadership
Department Leadership
Reports into VI or to Executive;
authority over Department
specific degree/credential or high
risk/scope/responsibility
Major Dept Heads; City-wide accountability and authority
Fields that qualify under S Track and that are not typically in-house
departments for a municipality, but required expertise from credentialling such
as Juris Doctorates and Professional Engineer licensing
Professional Field Classification Plan
Section 3:
Proposed Compensation Plan
Proposed Non-Union Compensation Ranges
I
II
S Track
III
S Track
IV
V
S Track
VI
IIIM
VM
VIM
Pay
Band
Non-Union Classification Plan
Individual Contributor I
Under general supervision; duties governed by rules, instructions or
procedures
Individual Contributor II
Independent judgment and discretion,
work leader
specific degree/credential or high
risk/scope/responsibility
Work Group Supervisor/Specialist
Manager
Under general direction of Dept Head, high level of independence, judgment,
supervisory
Advanced knowledge of a specific
trade/field & may supervise others
specific degree/credential or high
risk/scope/responsibility
Executive Leadership
Department Leadership
Reports into VI or to Executive;
authority over Department
specific degree/credential or high
risk/scope/responsibility
Major Dept Heads; City-wide accountability and authority
Fields that qualify under S Track and that are not typically in-house
departments for a municipality, but required expertise from credentialling such
as Juris Doctorates and Professional Engineer licensing
Professional Field Classification Plan
I
II
S Track
III
S Track
IV
V
S Track
VI
IIIM
$110,000 - $152,900
VM
$155,000 - $215,450
VIM
$180,000 - $250,200
Pay
Band
Non-Union Compensation Ranges
Individual Contributor I
$85,000 - $118,150
$65,000 - $90,350
Individual Contributor II
$75,000 - $104,250
Work Group Supervisor/Specialist
$100,000 - $139,000
Manager
$110,000 - $152,900
$90,000 - $125,100
Executive Leadership
Leadership
$120,000 - $166,800
$130,000 - $180,700
$155,000 - $215,450
Professional Field Compensation Ranges
Current Non-Union Ranges
Minimum pay under new
scale at $65,000 lifts those
previously at NU12 - NU14
$65,000
$75,000
$85,000
$90,000
$100,000
$110,000
$110,000
$120,000
$130,000
$155,000
$155,000
$180,000
$90,350
$104,250
$118,150
$125,100
$139,000
$152,900
$152,900
$166,800
$180,700
$215,450
$215,450
$250,200
$-
$50,000
$100,000
$150,000
$200,000
$250,000
$300,000
I
II
IIS
III
IIIS
IIIM
IV
V
VS
VM
VI
VIM
Proposed New Non-Union Salary Band Ranges
Individual
Contributors
(49% of staff)
Work Group Leaders,
Specialists, & Managers
(37% of staff)
Department & City Leadership
(13% of staff)
Distribution of Classification Under Old Scheme
Two-thirds of employees
are between NU13 and
NU8, lacking clear
differentiation between
roles that are all considered
Individual Contributors
Distribution of Classification Under New Scheme
Individual Contributors make up
49% of the new distribution,
with those who have supervisor
responsibilities/higher expertise
regraded accordingly (III or IV)
How will this transition
impact compensation
across the workforce?
Employees earning less will benefit the most
from the proposed plan
Largest increases are proposed for staff
at the lower end of the pay scale.
Lower current salary range
Higher current salary range
Lower
proposed
increase
Higher
proposed
increase
Distribution of Old & New Classification
New classification plan provides
equity for roles with similar skill,
effort & responsibility required
Section 4:
Boards, Commissions &
Elected Officials
Proposed changes to
Boards & Commissions
Each board, commission, or committee was assessed based on three factors:
1. Advisory Role: Provides recommendations or guidance on policy matters.
2. Enforcement Authority: Has the power to enforce regulations or ordinances.
3. Financial Responsibility: Controls or influences budgetary expenditures.
Once assessed, each Board and Commission was placed into one of three tiers. As
roles and responsibilities evolve, so can the tiering.
Additionally, standard increases for chair of committees (+5%) and alternate members
(50% stipend) are proposed.
Three-Tiered Pay Scale
Tier 3
$6,000 stipend
Highest Responsibility
•
Job Creation and Retention
Board*
•
Affordable Housing Trust*
•
Planning Board
•
Zoning Board of Appeals
Tier 2
$4,000 stipend
High Responsibility
•
Redevelopment Authority
•
Board of Health
•
Licensing Commission
•
Community Preservation
Committee*
•
Condominium Review Board
•
Election Commission
Tier 1
No stipend
Volunteer Basis
•
Historic Preservation
Commission
•
Arts Council Board
•
Fair Housing Commission
•
Traffic Commission
•
Urban Forestry Committee
•
Commission for Persons with
Disabilities
•
Ethics Commission
•
Urban Design Commission
& more…
* denotes a Board or Commission receiving no stipend under the status quo
Elected Officials
Based on a review of peer cities, no changes
are recommended at this time for:
•City Councilors
•School Committee Members
•Mayor
City Council
Stated Responsibilities & Further Review
Comparable Communities
•
In further analysis for City Councilors, estimates were developed with City Clerk staff
for duties required in an official capacity including engaging with constituents (15
hrs/month), participating in community events & public meetings (5 hrs/month), &
collaborating with city staff and stakeholders (5 hrs/month). Additionally, based on
Legistar data, Councilors attend between 90-155 hours per year in meetings.
•
Based on nearby communities with Mayor/Council forms of government,
compensation in Somerville is above both the median ($23,135) and average
($21,449) pay.
No changes to salaries proposed at this time.
Financial Analysis – Hourly Rate Estimated
•
155 + 12 * (15 + 5 + 5) = 450 hours estimated per year in an official capacity.
•
A conservative buffer of an additional 33% of hours increases the estimate to 600
annual hours required of a Somerville City Councilor in their official capacity.
•
$40,000 compensation / 600 hours = $66.67 hourly rate estimated.
City*
Council
Compensation
Somerville
$40,000
Medford
$29,359
Springfield
$28,000
Lynn
$25,182
Everett
$25,000
Revere
$25,000
Waltham
$23,135
Brockton
$21,464
Quincy
$19,700
Malden
$17,500
Newton
$15,500
Framingham
$5,000
Melrose
$4,000
*Comparable communities were selected from a list of Mayor/Council governments within the Boston metro area
School Committee
Comparable Communities
•
For 13 communities surveyed, Somerville School Committee members ranked the
3rd highest paid, behind Quincy and Springfield.
•
Compensation at $16,500 annually is above the median ($12,000) and average
($11,683) for the region
No changes to salaries proposed at this time.
City
School
Committee
Compensation
Quincy
$20,000
Springfield
$18,000
Somerville
$16,500
Brockton
$15,000
Waltham
$13,525
Everett
$12,500
Medford
$12,000
Malden
$12,000
Revere
$10,000
Lynn
$9,600
Newton
$7,750
Framingham
$5,000
Melrose
$0
Mayor
Comparable Communities
•
For 13 communities surveyed, the Mayor’s salary ranked 4th
highest paid, behind Everett, Quincy, and Brockton.
•
Compensation at $180,000 annually compares favorably to
the median of $165,000 and average $168,820 for peer cities.
City
Mayor
Compensation
Everett
$225,000
Quincy
$218,000
Brockton
$188,590
Somerville
$180,000
Springfield
$175,000
Revere
$167,500
Framingham
$165,000
Waltham
$160,533
Newton
$155,000
Malden
$150,000
Lynn
$145,000
Medford
$140,035
Melrose
$125,000
No changes to salaries proposed at this time.
Section 5:
Timeline & Rollout
Implementation retroactive
to January 2025
The FY25 Budget includes funding for salary adjustments for union and non-union staff.
Mayor Ballantyne and the City Council have identified recruiting and retaining top talent
as a priority across the organization.
Proposed salary adjustments are funded for implementation with an effective date of
the first payroll in January, if funded by the City Council.
Thank You
37
Questions and Answers