Matters ▸ Attachment
Committee Report - Rules - 9-21-10 — File 190154
September 21, 2010
Rules Special Committee
Page 1 of 2
Printed 9/22/2010
REPORT OF THE RULES SPECIAL COMMITTEE
Attendee Name
Title
Status
Arrived
William A. White Jr.
Chair
Present
Dennis M. Sullivan
Vice Chair
Absent
Walter F. Pero
Ward Four Alderman
Present
John M Connolly
Alderman At Large
Present
Rebekah L. Gewirtz
Ward Six Alderman
Present
John Long
City Clerk
Present
Frank Wright
City Solicitor
Present
Robert McWatters
Clerk of Committees
Present
Charles Sillari, Jr.
Clerk of Committees
Present
Peter Forcellese
Clerk of Committees
Present
Omar Boukili
Administrative Assistant
Present
Bruce M. Desmond
Alderman At Large
Present
•
Review of BOA rules
The Committee reviewed proposed changes to the Rules of the Board of Aldermen so that they
would be in compliance with the state's Open Meeting Law. Changes were discussed for the
following:
Rule 3 - changes adopted, as modified (pending)
Rule 22 - changes adopted as presented
Rule 23 - changes adopted as modified
Rule 24 - changes adopted as presented
Rule 43 - rule to be retained and modified
Rule 47 - changes adopted as modified
Rule 49 - Chairman White requested the City Solicitor to examine this rule as he is concerned
that documents are not actually signed. Mr. Wright will research the matter to determine
whether electronic approvals are sufficient. (pending)
Rule 53 - changes adopted as modified
The Committee will continue working on the rules and will present the new proposed rules to the
full Board of Aldermen when work is competed.
Committee Meeting
September 21, 2010
Rules Special Committee
Page 2 of 2
Printed 9/22/2010
•
Review of the State’s new Open Meeting Law and its impact on the rules and
operating procedures of the Board of Aldermen and its committees.
Mr. Wright reviewed the Law Department's responses to the committee's questions from the
September 8th meeting and stated that he would request further clarification from the Attorney
General's Office regarding questions #2 and 5, (on the attached handout of responses). There
was also a discussion about incorporating the response to question #1 into the Rules of the Board
of Aldermen.