Matters ▸ Attachment
Committee Report - Finance - 10-6-10 — File 190224
October 6, 2010
Finance Committee
Page 1 of 2
Printed 10/14/2010
REPORT OF THE FINANCE COMMITTEE
Attendee Name
Title
Status
Arrived
Maryann M. Heuston
Chair
Present
William A. White Jr.
Vice Chair
Present
Bruce M. Desmond
Alderman At Large
Present
John M Connolly
Alderman At Large
Present
Rebekah L. Gewirtz
Ward Six Alderman
Absent
William M. Roche
Ward One Alderman
Present
Walter F. Pero
Ward Four Alderman
Present
Dennis M. Sullivan
Alderman At Large
Present
Thomas F. Taylor
Ward Three Alderman
Present
Robert C. Trane
Ward Seven Alderman
Present
Sean T. O’Donovan
Ward Five Alderman
Absent
Robert May
OSPCD
Present
Monica Lamboy
OSPCD
Present
Anne Thomas
OSPCD
Present
Stephen Houdlette
Present
Omar Boukili
Administrative Assistant
Present
Denise Provost
State Representative
Present
Stephen Mackey
Exec. Director
Present
•
Public Hearing regarding the District Improvement Financing (DIF) Program
A Public Hearing was held to receive public input related to the city’s proposal to create a
District Improvement Financing (DIF) Development District and Program pursuant to M.G.L C.
40Q. Ms. Lamboy made it known that the document presented was only a draft for further
discussion and then went on to speak about Somerville’s history, new revitilization from rapid
transit development and some of the opportunities and challenges to come.
The area in question is comprised of many small irregular parcels totaling 460 acres and
accounts for 17.4% of the city’s land area. The base value of the property is $951 million and
the city prefers to act now while prices are low. The DIF is expected to free up private capital
with funds being passed to the general fund. The goal of the proposal is to capture land that
would be able to generate revenue after redevelopment.
Ms. Lamboy told the members that the proposed DIF would be the largest in the state and that
the city cannot afford not to move forward with this proposal, noting that the infrastructure at
Boynton Yards is so outdated that it can’t sustain new development. Mr. May discussed how
degradation impedes development and pointed out that the area being considered doesn’t have
sufficient underground utilities to service the development being proposed. Mr. Houdlette told
Committee Meeting
October 6, 2010
Finance Committee
Page 2 of 2
Printed 10/14/2010
the members that new growth is paramount for the city and spoke about both short and long term
impacts. Among the parcels being considered for eminent domain taking are the Union Square
Post Office and Ricky’s Flower Mart. Meetings will be held with property owners in the future
to discuss possible takings.
Representative Provost spoke about bonding and said that Massachusetts is the highest state in
debt and that its bond rating is low and said that tying up future revenues would restrict future
growth.
Members had concerns about the negative impact on the value of properties listed for possible
takings.
Several members of the public spoke on both sides of the issue with many commenting on the
manner in which property owners were notified.
The following information was requested by the committee:
•
A copy of the applicable state regulation(s)
•
An explanation of why each individual parcel was selected
•
A proposed timeline for adoption of the DIF
•
An opinion of counsel to point out in the DIF statute that the Board of Aldermen will
have the power to determine where money would be allocated.
•
A legal opinion on the process before the Board of Aldermen regarding eminent domain
takings
•
Examples of other DIF projects on the east coast and where the money came from
•
A list of uses for the proposed DIF
The record will be left open until the close of business on December 1, 2010.
190118 - That the Director of SPCD Inform This Board of the Results of a Public Hearing
Held on Sept. 15, 2010 Regarding the District Improvement Financing (DIF) Proposal.:
RESULT:
KEPT IN COMMITTEE
190159 - Requesting approval to create a District Improvement Financing (DIF)
Development District and a DIF Development Program pursuant to M.G.L C. 40Q and 402
CMR 3.00 Et Seq.:
RESULT:
KEPT IN COMMITTEE