🏛 The Somerville Record
Matters ▸ Attachment

Committee Report - Housing - 9-19-12 — File 193775

File 193775·2 pages·📄 Original PDF (city portal)·sha256 b4890354d1b7…
September 19, 2012 Housing and Community Development Committee Page 1 of 2 Printed 9/22/2012 REPORT OF THE HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE Attendee Name Title Status Arrived Tony Lafuente Chair Present Rebekah Gewirtz Vice Chair Absent Dennis M. Sullivan Alderman At Large Present William M. Roche Ward One Alderman Absent Maryann M. Heuston Ward Two Alderman Present Thomas F. Taylor Ward Three Alderman Present Sean T. O’Donovan Ward Five Alderman Present Robert C. Trane Ward Seven Alderman Present William A. White Jr. Alderman At Large Absent John M Connolly Alderman At Large Present Bruce M. Desmond Alderman At Large Absent Janice Delory Chief of Staff Present Omar Boukili Administrative Assistant Present Michael Glavin Exec. Director, OSPCD Present George Proakis Director of Planning Present Ed Bean Finance Director Present Frank Wright City Solicitor Present Hayes Morrison Director of Transportation & Infrastructure Present • Public Hearing on #193585: Union Square Revitalization Plan Mr. Glavin spoke about the plan and why it is being proposed, who will implement it, the cost and the timeline. The proposal, encompassing a 20-Year Action Plan for public and private investment in Union Square, is a major component of the city’s 2012 SomerVision Plan and will accelerate the Green Line Extension project schedule and link the Green Line station with Union Square. The plan will be implemented by the City of Somerville, the Somerville Redevelopment Authority, the MA Department of Housing & Community Development, private developers, business interests, community-based organizations, the MBTA and MassDOT. The cost for the first development phase (Block D-2) is estimated to be $8 million and later phases are estimated to cost $60 million. The anticipated timeline projects Green Line service beginning during the winter of 2016/2017. Several members of the public spoke on this issue, with most of the comments being concerned with sparing a business located at 35 Prospect Street, known as Crossfit Somerville, from being taken by
Committee of the Whole September 19, 2012 Housing and Community Development Committee Page 2 of 2 Printed 9/22/2012 eminent domain. Those individuals praised Crossfit Somerville for being a part of what makes Union Square special and for being a draw for other businesses in the city. The owner of the business and the building it’s housed in, J. T. Scott, told the members that he purchased the building and brought it up to code in 2 months so that he could open his business, which has now been in operation for 10 months. Mr. Scott said that he purchased this property because he believes in the revitalization of Union Square and he envisions growing the business, noting that growth is dependant on having the freedom to do so. He asked that this property not be included in the initial plan and he asked for the city’s trust. Stephen Mackey, Executive Director of the Chamber of Commerce, spoke in favor of the proposal, pointing out that Union Square has been poised to become a hub of activity for many years, but the missing link was transit - and this plan includes a T stop. The plan also raises legal, financial and emotional issues associated with eminent domain takings. Mr. Mackey stated that he believes the plan fulfills the legal requirement of the state and he stressed that Block D-2 is the immediate link to making the rest of the plan possible, although the city has no schedule for the other areas, at this point. What is clear, said Mr. Mackey, is that this area will go from generating $60K to $2 million per year in tax revenue. The Chamber of Commerce sees the distinction between Block D-2 and the other areas and asks that the full plan be considered, with the hope that the plan prevails. Thomas Bent stated that the Green Line Extension project is moving forward and stated that the MBTA requested that the City of Somerville acquire certain parcels in order to move the project forward. Mr. Bent asked that the plan prevail. Toni Shelzi, owner of the property at 4 Milk Place, stated her approval of the plan saying that it was in the best interest of the city, adding that transit is a catalyst for development. Peter Z., owner of industrial property, (in Block D-3), that that houses Royal White and its 400 employees, is in favor of transit expansion but he is not sure why his property was included in the plan. Another speaker pointed out that eminent domain can be cruel, saying that although Davis Square grew from transit, it wasn't draconian. He believes that the square should be allowed to grow organically. Wig Zamore spoke in favor of the plan saying that both sides in this discussion are correct and that diversity needs to be protected while new reviatalization is undertaken. He believes that negotiated takings will be better than eminent domain takings. Mr. Zamore also cautioned against using gross taxes as a measurement of anything, stating that the city needs to look at the net taxes gained as well as the quality of life provided to community. Alderman Heuston submitted an email she received from Michael Yenke, into the record. 193585 - Requesting approval of the Union Square Revitalization Plan, per MGL c121B s48 and 760 CMR 12.00 et seq.: RESULT: KEPT IN COMMITTEE